GET THE APP

44 161 768 9484

Awards Nomination 1.7+ Million Readerbase

GJMMS Navigation: About; Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement; Call For Paper; Editorial Board; Guide to Authors; Editorial Workflow; Submit Manuscript; Articles in process; Archives; Indexing and Archiving

Google Scholar citation report

Citations : 470

Global Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences received 470 citations as per Google Scholar report

Indexed In: Index Copernicus; Google Scholar; Sherpa Romeo; Open J Gate; Genamics JournalSeek; Academic Keys; ResearchBible; China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI); Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA); Electronic Journals Library; RefSeek; Hamdard University; EBSCO A-Z; OCLC- WorldCat; SWB online catalog; Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio); Publons; International committee of medical journals editors (ICMJE); Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research; Euro Pub; Academic OneFile - Agriculture Collection

Browse Journals By Category: Agricultural Sciences; Biological Sciences; Education; Engineering; Legal Studies; Medical Sciences; Physical Sciences; Social Sciences

Global Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences

El-Olemy AT

Public Health and Community Medicine, Public Health Dept. School of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt

Publications

Review Article
Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation for Treatment of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author(s): El-Olemy AT*, Tawfik MB, El-Olemy AT1, El-Olemy MA, Hasanain MA and Nashwa MR

Objective: To estimate the extent to which spinal manipulation is effective for adult patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Data sources: Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL); Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Trip database. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomized controlled trials examining the effect of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) in adults (??? 18 years) with chronic non-specific low back pain. Review methods: Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and quality of the evidence. The effect of SMT was compared with recommended therapies, non-recommended therapies, sham (placebo) SMT, and SMT as an adjuvant therapy. Main outcomes were pain and back specific functional status, ex.. Read More»

Abstract PDF